Firma guaman migrasi bebas terbesar di Australia. Dapatkan Rundingan PERCUMA
Perlukan bantuan? Kami boleh didapati 7 hari seminggu.


Pemenang Firma Guaman Migrasi Australia Paling Dipercayai 2023-2026
Kedudukan pertama untuk undang-undang migrasi pada 2023, 2024 & 2025

Terkemuka dalam senarai peguam migrasi terbaik 2023, 2024, 2025 & 2026

Kedudukan firma guaman migrasi terbaik 2024 & 2025


Permohonan sedia untuk membuat keputusan, disediakan oleh peguam.
Tiada Visa, Tiada pilihan Yuran tersedia.*
Konsultasi awal percuma (Tertakluk pada Terma & Syarat).
Kesimpulan Utama
From 25 July 2026, nomination and visa applications for certain skilled visas are processed according to Ministerial Direction 119, which has replaced Ministerial Direction 105 in full. Direction 119 applies to all on-hand applications, including the Skills in Demand (SID) visa, which was not previously covered by Direction 105.
Under Direction 119, prioritisation depends on two factors: the applicant's occupation, and whether the applicant was in Australia at the time of application. Occupations supporting Australia's law enforcement and defence interests receive the highest priority, followed by construction, healthcare and teaching occupations. Within this framework, applicants already in Australia are given higher priority than those applying from overseas.
In practice, this means an offshore applicant in a priority occupation such as healthcare or teaching is still processed after any onshore applicant in that same occupation. Offshore applicants outside the priority occupation categories face the lowest processing priority of all.
[free_consultation]
Jika anda berminat untuk mendapatkan lebih banyak maklumat mengenai visa, hubungi Peguam Migrasi Australia untuk berunding.
[/free_consultation]
Before Direction 119 took effect, decisions on many skilled visa applications were being made within a matter of weeks. Industry reporting since the change indicates offshore applicants outside the priority categories, including nurses and teachers, are now facing waits of up to around 12 months.
Migration and recruitment professionals have raised concerns about the practical effect of prioritising by occupation category alone. Because the priority tiers are broad and based on occupation category rather than specific skill shortages, migration professionals have noted a possible side effect: an onshore applicant in a broadly-defined priority category could be processed ahead of an offshore applicant in a genuinely hard-to-fill specialist role, simply due to location at the time of application.
The change forms part of a broader government effort to reduce Net Overseas Migration (NOM), which the government has targeted to bring down from around 300,000 to 225,000 by 2028. Family visa processing has been affected by a parallel change, and Working Holiday Maker visa processing has also reportedly slowed as part of the same broader approach.
[aml_difference] [/aml_difference]
The changes have drawn criticism from business and mining groups, who argue the settings could affect Australia's ability to fill specialist roles that cannot be sourced locally. Industry bodies have pointed to sectors including construction, healthcare and resources as being particularly reliant on offshore-sourced specialist skills, and have called for a more differentiated approach that better reflects genuine skill shortages within individual occupations.
Employers currently recruiting offshore for skilled or employer-sponsored roles should factor the extended processing timeframes into workforce planning, particularly for roles outside the priority occupation categories. Where a role can realistically be filled onshore, whether through the local labour market or an existing visa holder already in Australia, this pathway may now offer a materially faster route to visa grant under the new prioritisation framework.
For offshore applicants already in the system, an existing application has not been withdrawn or refused as a result of this change, but its position in the processing order may now be lower than previously expected.
[kisah_kejayaan] [/kisah_kejayaan]
Whether you're an employer planning your recruitment pipeline or an applicant affected by these processing changes, understanding how Direction 119 applies to your specific occupation and circumstances is essential to planning realistically. Our migration lawyers can review your situation, explain your options under the current framework, and help you consider whether an onshore pathway may better suit your timeframe.
We offer a free consultation, available seven days a week, to help you navigate these changes.

Dengan 15 tahun pengalaman dalam undang-undang dan pentadbiran awam Amerika Syarikat, diikuti dengan 5 tahun mengamalkan undang-undang migrasi Australia, Nick membawakan kepakaran undang-undang rentas bidang kuasa yang mendalam kepada kerjanya sebagai peguam migrasi Australia.
Nick memegang Ijazah Sarjana Muda Sastera dalam Sains Politik dari Florida State University (2000), Ijazah Doktor Juris dari St. Thomas University School of Law (2004), dan Ijazah Sarjana Pentadbiran Awam dari Florida State University (2007). Beliau telah menjadi ahli Bar Florida sejak 2006 dan Bar Mahkamah Rayuan Daerah Columbia sejak 2007, mewujudkan kerjaya undang-undang antarabangsa yang cemerlang sebelum berpindah ke Melbourne pada tahun 2021.
Selepas menamatkan pengajian undang-undang Australia di Universiti La Trobe dan Kolej Undang-undang, beliau telah diterima masuk sebagai peguam Australia oleh Mahkamah Agung Victoria pada tahun 2022. Beliau kemudiannya memperoleh Nombor Pengamal Undang-undang 5513285, yang mana beliau menjalankan amalan dalam undang-undang migrasi. Beliau merupakan ahli Institut Undang-undang Victoria.
Nick menawarkan panduan pakar tentang pelbagai perkara berkaitan migrasi. Setelah menjalani proses migrasi secara peribadi, beliau membawakan kepakaran profesional dan pemahaman yang tulen tentang apa yang pelanggan alami sepanjang proses tersebut.
Nick menawarkan perkhidmatan kepada pelanggan di seluruh negara, termasuk di Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth dan Adelaide, dengan menyediakan sokongan yang komprehensif.
Beliau telah mewakili pelanggan dalam prosiding di hadapan Tribunal Semakan Pentadbiran (ART), membawa pengalaman advokasi tribunal kepada perkara migrasi yang kompleks dan dipertikaikan.
Di luar kehidupan profesionalnya, Nick gemar membaca, melancong dan meneroka budaya kopi Melbourne.
PENAFIAN UNDANG-UNDANG: Artikel dan catatan blog yang diterbitkan oleh Australian Migration Lawyers hanya memberikan maklumat umum dan bukan merupakan nasihat migrasi atau undang-undang. Membaca kandungan ini tidak mewujudkan hubungan peguam-klien, dan sebarang pergantungan ke atasnya adalah atas risiko anda sendiri. Oleh kerana undang-undang migrasi sering berubah, sila rujuk Peguam Australia berdaftar untuk mendapatkan nasihat profesional yang disesuaikan dengan keadaan khusus anda sebelum membuat sebarang keputusan atau permohonan migrasi.
Beritahu kami tentang keadaan anda, dan kami akan kembali kepada anda tidak lama lagi.
Beritahu kami tentang keadaan anda, dan kami akan kembali kepada anda tidak lama lagi.
Beritahu kami sedikit tentang keadaan anda, dan salah seorang peguam penghijrahan kami akan kembali kepada anda secepat mungkin.