Australia's largest independent migration law firm. Get a FREE Consultation T&C's apply
도움이 필요하신가요? 연중무휴로 문의하실 수 있습니다.


2023-2026년 가장 신뢰받는 호주 이민 법률 사무소 수상
2023년, 2024년, 2025년 이민법 부문 1위를 차지했습니다.

2023년, 2024년, 2025년 및 2026년 최고의 이민 전문 변호사 선정

2024년 및 2025년 최고의 마이그레이션 로펌 선정


주요 내용
On 19 September 2026, Ministerial Direction 122 came into effect, changing the order in which the Department of Home Affairs considers and decides applications for certain permanent and provisional skilled visas. The Minister for Home Affairs, Immigration and Citizenship, the Hon Tony Burke MP, made the Direction under section 499 of the Migration Act 1958. The section allows the Minister to give written directions to decision makers about how they perform their functions. The Department of Home Affairs has updated its published skilled visa processing priorities to reflect the change.
Direction 122 was issued alongside Ministerial Direction 121, which sets processing priorities for temporary skilled visas, including the Skills in Demand (Subclass 482) visa. Together, the two Directions replace every processing priority that applied under Ministerial Direction 119. Direction 119 had commenced on 25 July 2026, replacing Direction 105, and was the first Direction to bring the Skills in Demand (Subclass 482) program into the priority framework. Direction 122 now deals separately with the provisional and permanent skilled streams.
The preamble explains that the Direction is designed to direct processing resources towards industries and occupations of strategic importance to Australia, and, in all other sectors, to favour skilled migrants who already contribute to the Australian community and economy.
[무료 상담]
비자에 대한 자세한 정보를 얻고 싶다면 호주 이민 변호사에게 연락하여 상담을 받으세요.
[/무료_상담]
The Schedule to Direction 122 lists the following visa classes. The Direction uses their formal class names under the Migration Regulations 1994, and the common names used by the Department of Home Affairs are given here:
Note: The Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (Subclass 187) and Skilled Regional (Provisional) (Subclass 489) visas were replaced from 16 November 2019 by the Skilled Employer Sponsored Regional (Provisional) (Subclass 494) and Skilled Work Regional (Provisional) (Subclass 491) visas. The Subclass 489 is closed to new primary applications, as is the Subclass 187 Direct Entry stream. The Subclass 187 Temporary Residence Transition stream, however, remains open to eligible transitional 457 and 482 workers. The Direction applies to Subclass 187 and 489 applications that remain undecided, including any new Subclass 187 TRT applications. The Skilled Regional (Subclass 887) and Business Innovation and Investment (Permanent) (Subclass 888) visas remain available, but only to people who hold, or have held, certain earlier provisional visas.
Temporary skilled visas, including the Skills in Demand (Subclass 482) visa, are dealt with under Direction 121 and are outside the scope of this article.
Section 6 of Direction 122 sets out four levels of priority. Under section 6(1), decision makers are to follow this order while having due regard to the Government's policy intentions for the size and composition of the Migration Program.
Section 6(3)(a) gives the highest priority to visa applications made by a primary applicant in relation to an occupation in the construction, healthcare, teaching, agriculture, aquaculture, fishing or resources sectors, or an occupation related to Australia's law enforcement or defence interests.
Each sector is defined in section 5(2) of the Direction by reference to Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) groups and specific occupations. Healthcare, for example, covers the Health Professionals sub-major group and a range of care and support roles, including Aged or Disabled Carer and Personal Care Assistant. Construction includes the construction trades and construction and mining labourers groups, as well as occupations such as Electrician (Special Class). Agriculture, aquaculture and fishing, along with the resources sector, are defined by what the nominated position directly involves, such as primary production or the exploration, extraction and production of minerals, oil, gas or coal.
Law enforcement occupations are limited to ANZSCO Unit Group 4413 (Police) where the applicant is nominated or sponsored by the Australian Federal Police or a state or territory police force. Defence occupations include roles that support the AUKUS trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, specifically Pillar I (conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines) or Pillar II (advanced capability development). They also include roles where the applicant is nominated or sponsored by, or holds a letter of support from, the Australian Defence Force or the Department of Defence, with further conditions applying to applicants who rely on a letter of support.
Section 6(3)(a) does not draw a distinction between onshore and offshore applicants. A primary applicant in a priority sector occupation falls within the highest priority whether they were in or outside Australia when they applied.
Under section 6(3)(b), the next priority is given to all other visa applications where the primary applicant was in Australia when the application was made. This reflects the preamble's focus on skilled migrants who already contribute to Australia.
Section 6(3)(c) places third those primary applicants who were outside Australia when they applied and whose application is not combined with another person's application at any time.
Under section 6(3)(d), all remaining applications fall into the lowest priority. On the structure of section 6(3), this appears to include applications from primary applicants outside Australia whose applications are combined with family members' applications.

Under section 6(4) of the Direction, family members whose applications are combined with the primary applicant's application, in a way the Migration Regulations 1994 permit, receive the same priority as the primary applicant.
The Direction does not apply to some family member applications at all. Under section 3(2)(d), it does not apply where a person claims to be a member of the family unit of a primary visa holder, did not make a combined application with that primary visa holder, and the primary visa holder was in Australia when they made their own application. Families considering adding members later should get advice on how this may affect the timing of the family member's application.
Section 3(3) provides that Direction 122 applies to visa applications made, but not finally decided, before it commenced, as well as to applications made on or after 19 September 2026. Applicants already waiting on a decision may find that their place in the processing order has moved, either up or down, depending on their occupation and where they were when they applied.
[aml_difference][/aml_difference]
Section 7 requires a decision maker to depart from the order in section 6 for a particular application if satisfied that it involves compelling circumstances affecting community safety, or the continuity of essential religious, cultural or community services in Australia.
Under section 3(2), the Direction also does not apply to:
Where a section 85 cap limits the number of visas that can be granted in a financial year, section 8 provides that applications covered by the Direction are processed in the same priority order, unless the section 7 exception applies.
Direction 122 governs only the order in which applications are considered. Section 4(4) confirms that it does not change the skilled occupation lists, and that every applicant must still meet the requirements of the Migration Act 1958 and the Migration Regulations 1994 to be granted a visa. Being in a higher priority group does not guarantee a faster outcome or a grant, and no processing timeframe is attached to any priority level.
Application quality still matters. An incomplete application, or one where further information must be requested, can be delayed regardless of its priority. As noted above, an application where it is readily apparent that the visa criteria would not be satisfied falls outside the Direction altogether.
For applicants and employers, the practical questions are whether the nominated occupation falls within a priority sector as defined in the Direction, and where the primary applicant is when the application is lodged. Occupations in the priority sectors sit ahead of all other applications, including onshore applications in other occupations. Outside those sectors, being in Australia at the time of lodgement places an application ahead of offshore applications.
Occupation classification is technical. Careful assessment of the nominated occupation and the position description before lodgement can help avoid an application being placed in a lower priority group than expected.
[성공 사례] [/성공 사례]
At Australian Migration Lawyers, our team has expertise across skilled and employer sponsored visa pathways. We can assess how Ministerial Direction 122 may affect your application, review whether your nominated occupation falls within a priority sector, and prepare decision-ready applications to reduce avoidable delays. Whether you are a skilled worker planning your next step or an employer sponsoring overseas talent, we can help maximise your chances of success.
Contact Australian Migration Lawyers today to discuss your circumstances with our team. We are available seven days a week.

미국 법 및 공공 행정 분야에서 15년간의 경력을 쌓은 뒤, 호주 이민법 분야에서 5년간 실무를 수행해 온 닉은 호주 이민 전문 변호사로서 여러 관할권에 걸친 심도 있는 법률 전문성을 업무에 발휘하고 있습니다.
Nick은 플로리다 주립대학교에서 정치학 학사(2000년), 세인트 토마스 대학교 법과대학에서 법학 박사(2004년), 플로리다 주립대학교에서 행정학 석사(2007년)를 취득했습니다. 2006년부터 플로리다 변호사, 2007년부터 컬럼비아 특별구 항소법원 변호사로 활동하며 탁월한 국제 법률 경력을 쌓은 후 2021년 멜버른으로 이전했습니다.
라 트로브 대학교(La Trobe University)와 더 컬리지 오브 로(The College of Law)에서 호주 법학 과정을 마친 후, 2022년 빅토리아주 대법원으로부터 호주 변호사 자격을 취득했습니다. 이후 변호사 등록번호 5513285를 부여받아 이민법 분야에서 활동하고 있습니다. 또한 빅토리아주 법률협회(Law Institute of Victoria)의 회원입니다.
닉은 다양한 이민 관련 문제에 대해 전문적인 조언을 제공합니다. 본인이 직접 이민 절차를 겪어본 경험을 바탕으로, 전문적인 지식은 물론 고객들이 그 과정에서 겪는 어려움을 진심으로 이해하며 상담해 드립니다.
닉은 멜버른, 시드니, 브리즈번, 퍼스, 애들레이드 등 전국 각지의 고객들에게 포괄적인 지원을 제공하고 있습니다.
그는 행정심판소(ART)에서 진행된 절차에서 의뢰인을 대리해 왔으며, 이러한 심판소 변론 경험을 바탕으로 복잡하고 쟁점이 많은 이민 관련 사안을 처리해 왔습니다.
업무 외 시간에는 닉은 독서, 여행, 그리고 멜버른의 커피 문화를 탐방하는 것을 즐깁니다.
법적 고지: Australian Migration Lawyers에서 게시하는 기사 및 블로그 게시물은 일반적인 정보만을 제공하며, 이민 또는 법률 자문을 구성하지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠를 읽는다고 해서 변호사-의뢰인 관계가 성립되는 것은 아니며, 본 콘텐츠에 의존하는 경우 그 책임은 전적으로 귀하에게 있습니다. 이민법은 수시로 변경되므로, 이민 관련 결정을 내리거나 신청을 진행하기 전에 귀하의 구체적인 상황에 맞춘 전문적인 조언을 얻기 위해 호주 등록 변호사에게 상담하시기 바랍니다.
상황을 알려주시면 곧 연락드리겠습니다.
상황을 알려주시면 곧 연락드리겠습니다.
고객님의 상황에 대해 간단히 알려주시면 저희 이민 변호사 중 한 명이 최대한 빨리 연락을 드릴 것입니다.

비자 신청에 대한 자세한 내용을 설명하는 종합적인 비자 가이드를 만들었습니다. 지금 바로 받아보세요.