El mayor bufete independiente de abogados especializados en migración de Australia. Abierto 7 días. Reserve aquí.
¿Necesita ayuda? Estamos a su disposición 7 días a la semana.
.webp)

Ganador del premio al bufete de abogados de inmigración australiano de mayor confianza 2023-2025
Primer puesto en Derecho de migración en 2023, 2024 y 2025

Clasificado entre los mejores abogados de migración 2023, 2024 y 2025

Mejor bufete de migración 2024 y 2025
%20(1).webp)
Mandatory visa cancellations under Section 501 of the Migration Act 1958 can have life-altering consequences, including immediate immigration detention and removal from Australia. Visa holders whose visas are mandatorily cancelled by the Department of Home Affairs are subject to immediate immigration detention. The Australian Government, through the Department of Home Affairs, has the power to cancel visas on certain grounds under the law. The process is subject to the Migration Act 1958 and Ministerial Directions. The grounds for mandatory visa cancellation are defined by law and enforced by the Australian Government and visas may be mandatorily cancelled if these grounds are met.
For non-citizens affected by such cancellations, the discretionary powers under Section 501CA provide a critical legal pathway to request revocation. Understanding the process, the considerations applied by decision-makers, and the strict timeframes is essential for anyone seeking to challenge a mandatory cancellation. This article explains how the s501CA process works, what factors influence a successful revocation, and the role of legal representation.
A mandatory cancellation is triggered when a visa holder is convicted of certain offences, including serious criminal conduct, and sentenced to imprisonment of 12 months or more. Offences such as sexually based offences involving a child, or offences resulting in a sentence of death or imprisonment, are key triggers for cancellation. A custodial institution refers to any place where a person is detained as a result of a court or tribunal decision. Punishment imposed by a court or tribunal, such as imprisonment, is a critical factor in the character test. A person may be liable for cancellation if they have been convicted of an offence and sentenced to a term of imprisonment imposed by a court or tribunal. This decision is made automatically by a delegate and does not provide an opportunity for the non-citizen to submit reasons before the cancellation takes effect. Once the visa is cancelled, the person is usually placed in immigration detention, underscoring the urgency of the next steps.
After a mandatory cancellation, the only legal recourse is to make a request for revocation under Section 501CA. After the cancellation, the person will be notified of the decision and informed of their right to seek revocation. This request must be submitted in writing within 28 days of receiving the cancellation notice. The timeframe is absolute: failure to lodge the request on time generally results in losing the opportunity to seek discretionary relief.
If the request for revocation is refused, the person may appeal to a tribunal or seek judicial review in the Federal Court. If the cancellation is not revoked, the refusal stands and the visa remains cancelled.
[aus_wide_service] [/aus_wide_service]
When considering a revocation request, the Minister or delegate must follow a Ministerial Direction such as No. 90 or No. 110. The Direction outlines primary and other considerations that guide the discretionary decision. The Minister or delegate must be satisfied that the person passes the character test and is of good character, having regard to all relevant factors. The character test is defined in the Migration Act 1958 and relates to criminal conduct, associations, and other matters. The meaning of the character test involves assessing whether the applicant passes the character test in relation to their conduct, criminal history, and associations. The Minister may personally engage with the case and must ensure procedural fairness in the decision-making process. This is the first stage in which an applicant can present comprehensive arguments and evidence supporting their case, making it a high-stakes opportunity to influence the outcome.
Key primary considerations under the Ministerial Direction include:
Other favourable considerations may include:
A successful s501CA submission must be comprehensive, evidence-based, and highly persuasive. This includes:
Given that this submission often represents the final chance to avoid removal, precision, completeness, and legal strategy are critical. The process must also comply with the principles of natural justice, ensuring the applicant has a fair opportunity to present their case.
Australian Migration Lawyers provide urgent, tailored assistance for s501CA requests, including:
For anyone facing a mandatory visa cancellation, early legal intervention can be the difference between staying in Australia and removal. Contact our migration lawyer Australia team today for urgent assistance.
[consulta_gratuita]
Si está interesado en obtener más información sobre un visado, póngase en contacto con Australian Migration Lawyers para una consulta.
[/consulta_gratis]
It occurs automatically when a non-citizen has a substantial criminal record and is serving a custodial sentence of 12 months or more.
Section 501CA allows a non-citizen to request revocation of a mandatory cancellation, giving the Minister or delegate discretion to reinstate the visa.
You must submit a written request within 28 days of receiving the cancellation notice.
The Minister considers primary factors such as community protection, best interests of children, and non-refoulement obligations, along with other relevant ties and personal circumstances.
Technically yes, but the process is complex and high-stakes, and expert legal assistance greatly improves the chances of a successful outcome.

Hemos creado unas completas guías de visados que describen los pormenores de las solicitudes de visado. Consiga la suya hoy mismo.