澳洲最大的獨立移民法律事務所。立即獲取免費諮詢(適用條款與細則)
需要協助嗎?我們每週 7 天提供服務。


2023-2026年度最受信賴澳洲移民法律事務所得主
2023 年、2024 年和 2025 年移民法排名第一

獲評為 2023、2024、2025 及 2026 年頂尖移民律師

獲評為 2024 & 2025 年最佳移民法律事務所

重點摘要
The Subclass 866 (Protection) visa is Australia’s permanent onshore protection visa. It is granted to people in Australia who are owed protection obligations as refugees, or who qualify for complementary protection, under the Migration Act 1958. The visa is permanent from the day it is granted and gives the holder full work rights, access to Medicare, and a pathway to Australian citizenship. The base application charge is $50 as at 1 July 2026.
Many people who hold or have held a protection visa are in genuine relationships and want to bring their partner to Australia or regularise their partner’s status here. Whether that is possible depends on the type of protection visa held and, where the relationship has existed for some time, what was declared when the protection visa was first granted.
[免費諮詢]
如果您有興趣獲得有關簽證的更多資訊,請聯繫澳大利亞移民律師進行諮詢。
[/free_consultation]
Yes. There are permanent and temporary forms of protection visa in Australia, and the distinction affects whether sponsorship is possible at all. The two situations work very differently.
A holder of the Subclass 866 is an Australian permanent resident. Because permanent residents are eligible to sponsor a partner visa, a Subclass 866 holder can sponsor their partner to apply for the onshore Partner Visa (Subclasses 820 and 801) or the offshore Subclass 309 partner visa, which leads to the permanent Subclass 100. The same eligibility criteria, relationship evidence requirements, and sponsorship limitations that apply to any other Australian permanent resident also apply.
A person on a temporary protection visa is not an Australian permanent resident and cannot sponsor a partner visa while they remain on that visa. The sponsor must be an Australian citizen, an Australian permanent resident, or an eligible New Zealand citizen. A temporary protection visa holder who is later granted a permanent visa becomes eligible to sponsor from that point. At that stage, the rules about relationships that existed before the permanent visa was granted will need to be considered carefully.
This is the most significant question for many former refugees and protection visa holders. Where the relationship existed before the permanent humanitarian visa was granted, it generally must have been declared to the Department of Home Affairs before that grant. If it was not declared, the partner visa generally cannot be granted. This is one of the most serious problems a former refugee sponsor can face and requires legal advice before anything is lodged.
If you were already in a married or de facto relationship when your Subclass 866 Protection visa was granted but did not disclose the relationship to the Department of Home Affairs, your partner visa application may face additional legal and evidentiary challenges.
Failing to declare the relationship does not automatically mean a Partner visa will be refused. However, you may lose access to certain concessions that would otherwise be available to partners of permanent humanitarian visa holders, including exemptions from the standard 12-month de facto relationship requirement that apply in some circumstances. The Department of Home Affairs may also compare the information provided in your original protection visa application against the information submitted with your partner visa application.
The outcome will depend on the individual circumstances, including when the relationship began, why it was not disclosed at the time of the humanitarian grant, and whether any inconsistencies raise questions about the accuracy of information previously provided to the Department of Home Affairs. Obtaining legal advice before lodging anything is important, so that these issues can be properly assessed and addressed in the application.
[aml_difference][/aml_difference]
The sponsor’s immigration history matters because the Department of Home Affairs compares what was said during the protection visa process with what is said in the partner visa application. If the sponsor described their marital status, relationships, or family situation one way in the humanitarian application and the couple now describe things differently, this can raise concerns about the genuineness of the relationship. It may also trigger issues under Public Interest Criterion 4020, which relates to false or misleading information in a visa application.
This does not mean every inconsistency is fatal, but it does mean that both applications need to be read alongside each other before any partner visa is prepared.
Former refugee sponsors often face practical difficulties that other sponsors do not, and these can affect both the application and the evidence package. Three issues come up regularly.
Many former refugees cannot safely obtain documents from their country of origin, including marriage certificates, birth certificates, and identity documents. Where official documents cannot be obtained, alternative evidence needs to be assembled carefully and explained to the Department of Home Affairs.
Some marriages were conducted as customary or religious ceremonies without a formal civil registration. Whether an overseas marriage is recognised in Australia for partner visa purposes depends on how it was conducted and the laws of the country where it took place. Unregistered or customary marriages require particular care in how they are presented to the Department of Home Affairs.
Where the sponsor is in Australia and the partner is overseas but cannot safely travel through their home country, couples sometimes can only meet in a third country. Evidence of these meetings, including photographs, travel records, and proof of accommodation, forms part of the relationship evidence.
The partner applies using the same pathway as any other partner visa applicant. If they are in Australia, they apply for the onshore Partner Visa (Subclasses 820 and 801). If they are outside Australia, they apply for the Subclass 309 partner visa, which leads to the permanent Subclass 100. Both pathways require evidence across the four aspects of a genuine relationship, covering financial, household, social, and commitment matters. The partner’s own character, health, and public interest criteria must also be satisfied, and the standard sponsorship limitations under regulation 1.20J apply.
The partner visa application fee is the same regardless of whether the sponsor holds a protection visa or any other eligible status. As at 1 July 2026, the main applicant fee is $11,710. Secondary applicants aged 18 or over are charged $5,860, and secondary applicants under 18 are charged $2,935.
[成功案例] [/成功案例]
Sponsoring a partner visa from a protection visa background is one of the more complex partner visa situations. The protection claims, the relationship timing, the declared or undeclared relationship question, and the evidence available all need to be understood together before an application is prepared.
Our migration lawyers offer a free consultation for partner visa matters. Contact Australian Migration Lawyers today to speak with our team.


尼克擁有 15 年美國法律及公共行政領域的經驗,其後又從事 5 年澳洲移民法實務工作,因此作為一名澳洲移民律師,他能將深厚的跨司法管轄區法律專業知識運用於其工作中。
尼克持有佛羅里達州立大學政治學文學士學位(2000年)、聖托馬斯大學法學院法學博士學位(2004年),以及佛羅里達州立大學公共行政碩士學位(2007年)。 自2006年起成為佛羅里達州律師協會會員,並於2007年取得哥倫比亞特區上訴法院律師資格。在2021年遷居墨爾本前,他已建立卓越的國際法律事業。
在拉籌伯大學(La Trobe University)及法律學院(The College of Law)完成澳洲法律學業後,他於2022年獲維多利亞州最高法院核准成為澳洲律師。其後,他取得執業律師編號5513285,並以此從事移民法相關業務。他是維多利亞州律師公會(Law Institute of Victoria)的會員。
尼克針對各類移民事務提供專業指導。由於他本人也曾親身經歷過移民流程,因此不僅具備專業知識,更能真切體會客戶在整個過程中所經歷的一切。
尼克為全國各地的客戶提供服務,包括墨爾本、雪梨、布里斯本、珀斯和阿德萊德,並提供全方位的支援。
他曾代表當事人參與行政覆核審裁處(ART)的聽證程序,並將其在審裁處的辯護經驗運用於複雜且具爭議性的移民案件中。
在工作之餘,尼克喜歡閱讀、旅行,以及探索墨爾本的咖啡文化。
法律免責聲明:由「澳洲移民律師」發布的文章及部落格貼文僅提供一般性資訊,並不構成移民或法律建議。閱讀此內容並不構成律師與客戶之間的關係,且任何依賴此內容的行為,風險均由您自行承擔。由於移民法規經常變更,在做出任何移民決定或提出申請之前,請諮詢註冊的澳洲律師,以獲取針對您具體情況量身訂製的專業建議。
請告訴我們您的情況,我們會盡快回覆您。
請告訴我們您的情況,我們會盡快回覆您。
請告訴我們您的情況,我們的移民律師會盡快回覆您。

我們製作了全面的簽證指南,概述了簽證申請的內在和外在。立即索取。