Australia's largest independent migration law firm. Get a FREE Consultation T&C's apply
需要協助嗎?我們每週 7 天提供服務。


2023-2026年度最受信賴澳洲移民法律事務所得主
2023 年、2024 年和 2025 年移民法排名第一

獲評為 2023、2024、2025 及 2026 年頂尖移民律師

獲評為 2024 & 2025 年最佳移民法律事務所

重點摘要
A permanent visa in Australia includes a travel facility, which is the period during which the holder can leave and re-enter Australia as a permanent resident. This facility generally lasts up to five years from the date the permanent visa was granted. Once it expires, the underlying permanent residency itself does not lapse, but the holder can no longer travel overseas and return as a permanent resident without first obtaining a Resident Return Visa (RRV).
An RRV is therefore not a fresh grant of permanent residency. It is a separate visa application that restores the travel facility for someone who already holds, or has held, Australian permanent residency, or who is a former Australian citizen.
[免費諮詢]
如果您有興趣獲得有關簽證的更多資訊,請聯繫澳大利亞移民律師進行諮詢。
[/free_consultation]
It is worth being clear on this distinction, since the two are often confused. Permanent residency itself does not expire, and a person who remains in Australia is not affected by their travel facility lapsing. The travel facility only becomes relevant if and when the person wants to leave and later return to Australia as a permanent resident. An RRV addresses that travel facility specifically, rather than the underlying permanent status.
The Department of Home Affairs assesses every Resident Return Visa application against the criteria for both Subclass 155 and Subclass 157, rather than requiring applicants to choose between them.
Subclass 155 is generally available where an applicant has spent at least two of the last five years in Australia as a permanent resident or citizen and can result in a travel facility of up to five years. Where that residence requirement is not met, Subclass 155 may still be available on a shorter basis, generally up to one year, where the applicant can demonstrate substantial ties to Australia that are of benefit to the country.
Subclass 157 applies where a person does not meet the Subclass 155 criteria but has lawfully spent some time in Australia as a permanent resident or citizen within the past five years and can show a compelling and compassionate reason for their absence. It has a considerably shorter travel facility than Subclass 155.
Because eligibility depends heavily on individual travel history and circumstances, this is an area where general guidance only takes an applicant so far, and professional advice is often the more reliable path.
[aml_difference][/aml_difference]
The government application charge for the Resident Return Visa rose substantially from 1 July 2026. Given how significant and recent this change is, applicants should treat any fee figure they see online with caution and confirm the current charge directly through the Department of Home Affairs before lodging, since it may differ depending on the applicant's passport and other circumstances.
Processing times for the Resident Return Visa vary widely depending on which pathway an application is assessed under. Applications that clearly meet the standard residence requirement tend to be resolved considerably faster than those relying on substantial ties or compelling and compassionate circumstances, which require a more detailed assessment by the Department. Current processing time ranges are published on the Department of Home Affairs website and should be checked closer to the time of application, as they change regularly.
[成功案例] [/成功案例]
Whether you are approaching the end of your travel facility, have already spent time overseas, or are unsure which pathway applies to your circumstances, getting a Resident Return Visa application right the first-time matters, particularly given how much is now at stake with the increased application charge. The team at Australian Migration Lawyers can help you understand your position and prepare a strong application. Get in touch for a consultation, available seven days a week.

尼克擁有 15 年美國法律及公共行政領域的經驗,其後又從事 5 年澳洲移民法實務工作,因此作為一名澳洲移民律師,他能將深厚的跨司法管轄區法律專業知識運用於其工作中。
尼克持有佛羅里達州立大學政治學文學士學位(2000年)、聖托馬斯大學法學院法學博士學位(2004年),以及佛羅里達州立大學公共行政碩士學位(2007年)。 自2006年起成為佛羅里達州律師協會會員,並於2007年取得哥倫比亞特區上訴法院律師資格。在2021年遷居墨爾本前,他已建立卓越的國際法律事業。
在拉籌伯大學(La Trobe University)及法律學院(The College of Law)完成澳洲法律學業後,他於2022年獲維多利亞州最高法院核准成為澳洲律師。其後,他取得執業律師編號5513285,並以此從事移民法相關業務。他是維多利亞州律師公會(Law Institute of Victoria)的會員。
尼克針對各類移民事務提供專業指導。由於他本人也曾親身經歷過移民流程,因此不僅具備專業知識,更能真切體會客戶在整個過程中所經歷的一切。
尼克為全國各地的客戶提供服務,包括墨爾本、雪梨、布里斯本、珀斯和阿德萊德,並提供全方位的支援。
他曾代表當事人參與行政覆核審裁處(ART)的聽證程序,並將其在審裁處的辯護經驗運用於複雜且具爭議性的移民案件中。
在工作之餘,尼克喜歡閱讀、旅行,以及探索墨爾本的咖啡文化。
法律免責聲明:由「澳洲移民律師」發布的文章及部落格貼文僅提供一般性資訊,並不構成移民或法律建議。閱讀此內容並不構成律師與客戶之間的關係,且任何依賴此內容的行為,風險均由您自行承擔。由於移民法規經常變更,在做出任何移民決定或提出申請之前,請諮詢註冊的澳洲律師,以獲取針對您具體情況量身訂製的專業建議。
請告訴我們您的情況,我們會盡快回覆您。
請告訴我們您的情況,我們會盡快回覆您。
請告訴我們您的情況,我們的移民律師會盡快回覆您。