澳洲最大的獨立移民法律事務所。立即獲取免費諮詢(適用條款與細則)
需要協助嗎?我們每週 7 天提供服務。


2023-2026年度最受信賴澳洲移民法律事務所得主
2023 年、2024 年和 2025 年移民法排名第一

獲評為 2023、2024、2025 及 2026 年頂尖移民律師

獲評為 2024 & 2025 年最佳移民法律事務所

重點摘要
The Prospective Marriage Visa (Subclass 300) is a temporary Australian visa that allows the fiancé or fiancée of an Australian citizen, Australian permanent resident, or eligible New Zealand citizen to travel to Australia to marry their partner. It is sometimes referred to as a fiancé visa and is the starting point for couples who intend to build a life together in Australia through the Partner Visa (Subclasses 820 and 801).
When couples apply for the Subclass 300, the plan is to travel to Australia, marry their partner within the visa period, and begin the pathway toward permanent residency. That plan depends entirely on timing, and timing is fixed by law. The Subclass 300 carries a legal condition under the Migration Regulations 1994 requiring marriage within the visa period, which is typically nine months from first entering Australia. When a wedding is delayed for any reason, whether a venue cancellation, a medical circumstance, travel disruptions, or a change in personal plans, the consequences for the applicant’s immigration status can be significant. Understanding what the law requires, and what options remain, is the first step.
[免費諮詢]
如果您有興趣獲得有關簽證的更多資訊,請聯繫澳大利亞移民律師進行諮詢。
[/free_consultation]
The Prospective Marriage Visa (Subclass 300) must be applied for and granted while the applicant is outside Australia. Once granted, the visa is valid for a period of nine to 15 months. Within that period, Schedule 8, clause 8519 of the Migration Regulations 1994 requires the holder to marry the sponsoring partner within the visa period. In practice, this means marriage must occur within nine months of first entering Australia on the Subclass 300.
There is a second mandatory condition (clause 8515) which requires that the holder not marry before entering Australia. Marriage must therefore follow, not precede, entry. The marriage itself does not have to take place in Australia. It can occur in any country, provided the marriage is legally valid under the laws of that country and takes place within the nine-month period from the date of first entry.
The total visa validity of up to 15 months is structured to allow the couple time to lodge the Subclass 820 Partner Visa after the wedding while the Subclass 300 is still in effect. The marriage, however, must occur within the nine-month window regardless of how much total visa time remains.
The most important fact for any applicant facing a delayed wedding is that the Subclass 300 Prospective Marriage Visa cannot be extended under any circumstances, and a further Subclass 300 cannot be granted.
There is no provision within the Migration Act 1958 or the Migration Regulations 1994 that allows the Department of Home Affairs to extend the visa period or issue a replacement. The visa period stated at the time of grant is final. When the Subclass 300 is issued, the countdown begins immediately. The reasons for a wedding delay are not considered within the visa conditions. Couples facing any uncertainty about their wedding timeline should seek advice from a migration lawyer as early as possible.
The available options depend on where the applicant stands in terms of the marriage deadline, whether the wedding has already taken place, and whether the Subclass 300 is still valid. Each situation requires individual assessment. The following covers the most common scenarios and what each one means for the applicant’s stay in Australia.
If the delay is short and the nine-month window has not yet closed, the most straightforward resolution is to reschedule the ceremony to a date within that window. As noted above, the marriage can occur in any country as long as it is legally valid and takes place before the nine-month mark from the date of first entry.
Once married, the applicant should then lodge the Subclass 820 Partner Visa (Temporary) before the Subclass 300 expires. This sequence is critical for both maintaining lawful status in Australia and preserving access to the reduced government application charge available to Subclass 300 holders.
If the marriage has taken place within the required period but the Subclass 820 has not yet been lodged and the Subclass 300 is approaching expiry, the priority is to lodge the 820 application as soon as possible.
Lodging before the Subclass 300 expires serves two purposes. It triggers the grant of a Bridging Visa A, which allows the applicant to remain lawfully in Australia while the 820 is assessed, and it secures the lowest available application charge. As at 1 July 2026, a Subclass 300 holder who is married and lodges the Subclass 820/801 before the 300 expires pays a base application charge of $1,955 for the main applicant, compared to $11,710 for a standard Subclass 820/801 application with no prior connection to the Subclass 300.
If the Subclass 300 has already ceased by the time the 820 is lodged, the applicant may still apply for the Subclass 820 onshore as a former 300 holder. In that case, the base application charge rises to $2,475 for the main applicant as at 1 July 2026. This is still lower than the standard rate, but the financial advantage of lodging while the 300 remains active is clear.
If the visa period has elapsed without the marriage taking place, the Subclass 300 ceases automatically under Schedule 8, clause 8519 of the Migration Regulations 1994. The applicant is no longer lawfully in Australia and must depart.
An applicant who finds themselves in this position before the visa expires should seek urgent advice from a migration lawyer. Depending on individual circumstances, there may be scope to apply for another substantive visa to maintain lawful status while a longer-term pathway is identified. Applying for another visa type does not restore the Subclass 300 or reset the marriage condition.
Where the couple intends to continue their relationship and marry, they would typically need to marry and then apply for the offshore Partner Visa (Subclass 309/100) from outside Australia. That pathway carries its own eligibility requirements and processing timeframes, and legal advice should be sought before any steps are taken.
[aml_difference][/aml_difference]
If the marriage took place after the Subclass 300 application was lodged but before the Department of Home Affairs made a decision, the applicant is no longer eligible for the Subclass 300. The Department of Home Affairs must be notified promptly via ImmiAccount, with evidence of the marriage attached. If the Department of Home Affairs is not notified and the application is left unchanged, the Subclass 300 will be refused on the basis that the applicant no longer meets the eligibility requirements for that visa.
Under Regulation 2.08E of the Migration Regulations 1994, notification triggers a deemed new application for the offshore Partner Visa (Subclasses 309/100) without an additional government application charge. The Subclass 309 is a provisional visa that, following the required waiting period, leads to the permanent Partner Visa (Subclass 100). The eligibility requirements and evidence obligations for the Subclass 309/100 are more comprehensive than those of the Subclass 300, and a migration lawyer should be consulted before or immediately after notifying the Department of Home Affairs.
If the relationship ends before the marriage and the Subclass 300 has not resulted in a wedding, there is no remaining pathway through the Subclass 300 or the Subclass 820. Eligibility for the Prospective Marriage Visa requires a genuine and continuing intention to marry the sponsoring partner.
If the relationship ends after the marriage and a Subclass 820 has already been lodged, there are limited circumstances in which the applicant may still be eligible to continue. These include situations where the applicant or their child has experienced family violence in the relationship, where the couple has a child together, or where the sponsoring partner has passed away. Each circumstance is assessed individually and requires legal advice. An applicant in this position should contact a migration lawyer without delay.
[成功案例] [/成功案例]
At Australian Migration Lawyers, our migration lawyers work with couples at every stage of the Subclass 300 and Partner Visa process, including those facing unexpected delays or complications. Whether the wedding has been rescheduled, the visa is approaching expiry, or the circumstances have changed since lodgement, our team can assess your current position and advise on the most appropriate steps.
We offer a free initial consultation for partner visa enquiries, including the Prospective Marriage Visa (Subclass 300). Call 1300 150 745 or book a consultation online to speak with one of our migration lawyers about your situation.


尼克擁有 15 年美國法律及公共行政領域的經驗,其後又從事 5 年澳洲移民法實務工作,因此作為一名澳洲移民律師,他能將深厚的跨司法管轄區法律專業知識運用於其工作中。
尼克持有佛羅里達州立大學政治學文學士學位(2000年)、聖托馬斯大學法學院法學博士學位(2004年),以及佛羅里達州立大學公共行政碩士學位(2007年)。 自2006年起成為佛羅里達州律師協會會員,並於2007年取得哥倫比亞特區上訴法院律師資格。在2021年遷居墨爾本前,他已建立卓越的國際法律事業。
在拉籌伯大學(La Trobe University)及法律學院(The College of Law)完成澳洲法律學業後,他於2022年獲維多利亞州最高法院核准成為澳洲律師。其後,他取得執業律師編號5513285,並以此從事移民法相關業務。他是維多利亞州律師公會(Law Institute of Victoria)的會員。
尼克針對各類移民事務提供專業指導。由於他本人也曾親身經歷過移民流程,因此不僅具備專業知識,更能真切體會客戶在整個過程中所經歷的一切。
尼克為全國各地的客戶提供服務,包括墨爾本、雪梨、布里斯本、珀斯和阿德萊德,並提供全方位的支援。
他曾代表當事人參與行政覆核審裁處(ART)的聽證程序,並將其在審裁處的辯護經驗運用於複雜且具爭議性的移民案件中。
在工作之餘,尼克喜歡閱讀、旅行,以及探索墨爾本的咖啡文化。
法律免責聲明:由「澳洲移民律師」發布的文章及部落格貼文僅提供一般性資訊,並不構成移民或法律建議。閱讀此內容並不構成律師與客戶之間的關係,且任何依賴此內容的行為,風險均由您自行承擔。由於移民法規經常變更,在做出任何移民決定或提出申請之前,請諮詢註冊的澳洲律師,以獲取針對您具體情況量身訂製的專業建議。
請告訴我們您的情況,我們會盡快回覆您。
請告訴我們您的情況,我們會盡快回覆您。
請告訴我們您的情況,我們的移民律師會盡快回覆您。

我們製作了全面的簽證指南,概述了簽證申請的內在和外在。立即索取。