Both the applicant and sponsor must meet character requirements for a partner visa, under section 501 of the Migration Act 1958 and Schedule 4 of the Migration Regulations 1994.
Schedule 4 covers health, character, and other public interest criteria, and is separate from Schedule 3, which deals with unlawful status timing issues.
Sponsors with a registrable offence conviction can generally be barred from sponsoring, subject to a possible waiver in compelling circumstances.
Serious cases may be referred to the Visa Applicant Character Consideration Unit for a more detailed assessment.
There is no formal waiver of the character test itself, but compelling evidence can still support a favourable discretionary decision.
If a character issue leads to refusal, review options include the Administrative Review Tribunal, judicial review, and, in rare cases, ministerial intervention.
The specific character criteria applied to a partner visa application sit in Schedule 4 of the Migration Regulations 1994, under the Public Interest Criteria, alongside separate health related criteria. Schedule 4 is a different legal instrument to Schedule 3, which addresses whether an applicant validly held or lost a substantive visa before applying onshore, not character. It is common for these two to be confused, since both can affect a partner visa application, but they deal with entirely different issues.
A sponsor with a conviction for a registrable offence is generally barred from being approved as a sponsor, unless more than five years have passed since completing the sentence for that offence, and no further registrable offence has been charged since. Where this bar applies, the Department may still grant a waiver in compelling circumstances, such as a dependent child of the relationship or a genuine long-term relationship, assessed on a case-by-case basis.
A substantial criminal record, generally meaning a sentence of 12 months or more imprisonment, or two or more sentences totalling 12 months or more, is treated as one of the most serious character concerns and can lead to a mandatory rather than discretionary refusal in some circumstances.
For time spent living in Australia, this generally means an Australian Federal Police National Police Check. For time spent in other countries, applicants need to obtain an equivalent overseas police clearance certificate from each relevant country, which can take considerably longer to arrange and should be started early.
Some of these issues, particularly serious criminal convictions, security concerns, or a history of deportation, may lead a case officer to refer the file to the Visa Applicant Character Consideration Unit (VACCU) for a more detailed assessment. A VACCU referral does not decide the outcome itself, but it typically means a longer and more thorough review before a final decision is made.
This kind of statement is sometimes referred to as a character concern response. Where possible, it should directly address each specific concern the Department has raised, rather than responding generally, and should be supported by independent evidence wherever available, such as counselling records, references, or evidence of completed rehabilitation programs.
Whether a refusal is discretionary or effectively mandatory depends on the specific ground relied on. A substantial criminal record generally triggers a stricter, less discretionary approach, while other character concerns, such as association with questionable individuals, are weighed as part of a broader discretionary assessment that considers factors including the seriousness of the conduct, family ties in Australia, and the best interests of any children involved.
%402x.svg){kind=icon}
.svg)
.webp)
