Kailangan mo ba ng tulong? Kami ay magagamit upang makipag usap sa iyo 7 araw sa isang linggoMagbasa Nang Higit Pa

Australia's largest independent migration law firm. Get a FREE Consultation T&C's apply

Kailangan mo ba ng tulong? 7 days a week kami available.

Icon ng simbolo ng krus
Blangko na Imahe
0800 010 010
Buksan ang 7 araw
Icon ng smartphone
1300 150 745

Skilled Visa Processing Order Change

Senior Associate - Senior Australian Migration Lawyer
Na-publish noong:
September 23, 2026
|
Binago noong:
September 23, 2026
Trabaho at Kasanayan
Senior Associate - Senior Australian Migration Lawyer
Na-publish noong:
September 23, 2026
Binago noong:
September 23, 2026
Senior Associate - Senior Australian Migration Lawyer
Na-publish noong:
September 23, 2026
Binago noong:
September 23, 2026
Talaan ng mga Nilalaman
Ayusin natin ang aplikasyon mo para sa visa.

Mga aplikasyon na handa nang magdesisyon, na inihanda ng mga abogado.

Libreng paunang konsultasyon (may mga tuntunin at kundisyon na nalalapat).

Makipag-usap sa amin

Mga Pangunahing Puntos

  • Ministerial Direction 122 commenced on 19 September 2026 and, together with Direction 121, replaces Direction 119
  • Covers permanent and provisional skilled visas, including Subclasses 186, 189, 190, 491 and 494
  • Top priority goes to construction, healthcare, teaching, agriculture, aquaculture, fishing, resources, law enforcement and defence occupations
  • Outside those sectors, primary applicants in Australia at lodgement are given priority over offshore applicants
  • Applies to applications already lodged, as well as new applications
  • Affects processing order only, not visa eligibility criteria
minutong nabasa

What Is Ministerial Direction 122?

On 19 September 2026, Ministerial Direction 122 came into effect, changing the order in which the Department of Home Affairs considers and decides applications for certain permanent and provisional skilled visas. The Minister for Home Affairs, Immigration and Citizenship, the Hon Tony Burke MP, made the Direction under section 499 of the Migration Act 1958. The section allows the Minister to give written directions to decision makers about how they perform their functions. The Department of Home Affairs has updated its published skilled visa processing priorities to reflect the change.

Direction 122 was issued alongside Ministerial Direction 121, which sets processing priorities for temporary skilled visas, including the Skills in Demand (Subclass 482) visa. Together, the two Directions replace every processing priority that applied under Ministerial Direction 119. Direction 119 had commenced on 25 July 2026, replacing Direction 105, and was the first Direction to bring the Skills in Demand (Subclass 482) program into the priority framework. Direction 122 now deals separately with the provisional and permanent skilled streams.

The preamble explains that the Direction is designed to direct processing resources towards industries and occupations of strategic importance to Australia, and, in all other sectors, to favour skilled migrants who already contribute to the Australian community and economy.

[free_consultation]

Email Address *

Kung interesado kang makakuha ng karagdagang impormasyon tungkol sa isang visa, makipag ugnay sa Australian Migration Lawyers para sa isang konsultasyon.

[/free_consultation]

Which Visas Does Direction 122 Apply To?

The Schedule to Direction 122 lists the following visa classes. The Direction uses their formal class names under the Migration Regulations 1994, and the common names used by the Department of Home Affairs are given here:

Note: The Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (Subclass 187) and Skilled Regional (Provisional) (Subclass 489) visas were replaced from 16 November 2019 by the Skilled Employer Sponsored Regional (Provisional) (Subclass 494) and Skilled Work Regional (Provisional) (Subclass 491) visas. The Subclass 489 is closed to new primary applications, as is the Subclass 187 Direct Entry stream. The Subclass 187 Temporary Residence Transition stream, however, remains open to eligible transitional 457 and 482 workers. The Direction applies to Subclass 187 and 489 applications that remain undecided, including any new Subclass 187 TRT applications. The Skilled Regional (Subclass 887) and Business Innovation and Investment (Permanent) (Subclass 888) visas remain available, but only to people who hold, or have held, certain earlier provisional visas.

Temporary skilled visas, including the Skills in Demand (Subclass 482) visa, are dealt with under Direction 121 and are outside the scope of this article.

The New Order of Priority Under Direction 122

Section 6 of Direction 122 sets out four levels of priority. Under section 6(1), decision makers are to follow this order while having due regard to the Government's policy intentions for the size and composition of the Migration Program.

Priority 1: Key Sectors and National Interest Occupations

Section 6(3)(a) gives the highest priority to visa applications made by a primary applicant in relation to an occupation in the construction, healthcare, teaching, agriculture, aquaculture, fishing or resources sectors, or an occupation related to Australia's law enforcement or defence interests.

Each sector is defined in section 5(2) of the Direction by reference to Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) groups and specific occupations. Healthcare, for example, covers the Health Professionals sub-major group and a range of care and support roles, including Aged or Disabled Carer and Personal Care Assistant. Construction includes the construction trades and construction and mining labourers groups, as well as occupations such as Electrician (Special Class). Agriculture, aquaculture and fishing, along with the resources sector, are defined by what the nominated position directly involves, such as primary production or the exploration, extraction and production of minerals, oil, gas or coal.

Law enforcement occupations are limited to ANZSCO Unit Group 4413 (Police) where the applicant is nominated or sponsored by the Australian Federal Police or a state or territory police force. Defence occupations include roles that support the AUKUS trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, specifically Pillar I (conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines) or Pillar II (advanced capability development). They also include roles where the applicant is nominated or sponsored by, or holds a letter of support from, the Australian Defence Force or the Department of Defence, with further conditions applying to applicants who rely on a letter of support.

Section 6(3)(a) does not draw a distinction between onshore and offshore applicants. A primary applicant in a priority sector occupation falls within the highest priority whether they were in or outside Australia when they applied.

Priority 2: Primary Applicants in Australia

Under section 6(3)(b), the next priority is given to all other visa applications where the primary applicant was in Australia when the application was made. This reflects the preamble's focus on skilled migrants who already contribute to Australia.

Priority 3: Primary Applicants Outside Australia Applying Alone

Section 6(3)(c) places third those primary applicants who were outside Australia when they applied and whose application is not combined with another person's application at any time.

Priority 4: All Other Applications

Under section 6(3)(d), all remaining applications fall into the lowest priority. On the structure of section 6(3), this appears to include applications from primary applicants outside Australia whose applications are combined with family members' applications.

How Family Members Are Treated

Under section 6(4) of the Direction, family members whose applications are combined with the primary applicant's application, in a way the Migration Regulations 1994 permit, receive the same priority as the primary applicant.

The Direction does not apply to some family member applications at all. Under section 3(2)(d), it does not apply where a person claims to be a member of the family unit of a primary visa holder, did not make a combined application with that primary visa holder, and the primary visa holder was in Australia when they made their own application. Families considering adding members later should get advice on how this may affect the timing of the family member's application.

Applications Already Lodged

Section 3(3) provides that Direction 122 applies to visa applications made, but not finally decided, before it commenced, as well as to applications made on or after 19 September 2026. Applicants already waiting on a decision may find that their place in the processing order has moved, either up or down, depending on their occupation and where they were when they applied.

[aml_difference] [/aml_difference]

Exceptions and Applications Outside the Direction

Section 7 requires a decision maker to depart from the order in section 6 for a particular application if satisfied that it involves compelling circumstances affecting community safety, or the continuity of essential religious, cultural or community services in Australia.

Under section 3(2), the Direction also does not apply to:

  • applications remitted by the former Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) or the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) for reconsideration
  • applications where either tribunal has set aside a decision and substituted a new decision
  • applications where it is readily apparent that the criteria for the visa would not be satisfied
  • the ART itself

Where a section 85 cap limits the number of visas that can be granted in a financial year, section 8 provides that applications covered by the Direction are processed in the same priority order, unless the section 7 exception applies.

What Direction 122 Does Not Change

Direction 122 governs only the order in which applications are considered. Section 4(4) confirms that it does not change the skilled occupation lists, and that every applicant must still meet the requirements of the Migration Act 1958 and the Migration Regulations 1994 to be granted a visa. Being in a higher priority group does not guarantee a faster outcome or a grant, and no processing timeframe is attached to any priority level.

Application quality still matters. An incomplete application, or one where further information must be requested, can be delayed regardless of its priority. As noted above, an application where it is readily apparent that the visa criteria would not be satisfied falls outside the Direction altogether.

What This Means for Skilled Visa Applicants and Employers

For applicants and employers, the practical questions are whether the nominated occupation falls within a priority sector as defined in the Direction, and where the primary applicant is when the application is lodged. Occupations in the priority sectors sit ahead of all other applications, including onshore applications in other occupations. Outside those sectors, being in Australia at the time of lodgement places an application ahead of offshore applications.

Occupation classification is technical. Careful assessment of the nominated occupation and the position description before lodgement can help avoid an application being placed in a lower priority group than expected.

[mga_kwento_ng_tagumpay] [/mga_kwento_ng_tagumpay]

Paano Ka Namin Matutulungan

At Australian Migration Lawyers, our team has expertise across skilled and employer sponsored visa pathways. We can assess how Ministerial Direction 122 may affect your application, review whether your nominated occupation falls within a priority sector, and prepare decision-ready applications to reduce avoidable delays. Whether you are a skilled worker planning your next step or an employer sponsoring overseas talent, we can help maximise your chances of success.

Contact Australian Migration Lawyers today to discuss your circumstances with our team. We are available seven days a week.

Nicholas Merlin Esq.

Taglay ang 15 taong karanasan sa batas ng Estados Unidos at administrasyong pampubliko, na sinundan ng 5 taong pagsasanay sa batas ng imigrasyon sa Australia, si Nick ay may lalim ng kadalubhasaan sa batas na sumasaklaw sa iba't ibang hurisdiksyon sa kanyang trabaho bilang isang abogado sa imigrasyon sa Australia.

Si Nick ay nagtataglay ng Bachelor of Arts sa Political Science mula sa Florida State University (2000), isang Juris Doctorate mula sa St. Thomas University School of Law (2004), at isang Master of Public Administration mula sa Florida State University (2007). Siya ay miyembro ng Florida Bar mula pa noong 2006 at ng District of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar mula noong 2007, na nagtatag ng isang kilalang internasyonal na legal na karera bago lumipat sa Melbourne noong 2021.

Matapos makumpleto ang kanyang pag-aaral ng batas sa Australia sa La Trobe University at The College of Law, tinanggap siya bilang isang abogado sa Australia ng Korte Suprema ng Victoria noong 2022. Kalaunan ay nakuha niya ang Legal Practitioner Number 5513285, kung saan siya nagpapraktis sa batas ng migrasyon. Siya ay miyembro ng Law Institute of Victoria.

Nag-aalok si Nick ng ekspertong gabay sa iba't ibang usapin ng migrasyon. Dahil personal niyang naranasan ang proseso ng migrasyon, taglay niya ang parehong propesyonal na kadalubhasaan at tunay na pag-unawa sa mga nararanasan ng mga kliyente sa buong proseso.

Naglilingkod si Nick sa mga kliyente sa buong bansa, kabilang ang sa Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth, at Adelaide, at nagbibigay ng komprehensibong suporta.  

Kinatawan niya ang mga kliyente sa mga paglilitis sa harap ng Administrative Review Tribunal (ART), na nagdadala ng karanasan sa pagtataguyod ng tribunal sa mga kumplikado at pinagtatalunang usapin ng migrasyon.

Bukod sa kanyang propesyonal na buhay, mahilig din si Nick sa pagbabasa, paglalakbay, at paggalugad sa kultura ng kape sa Melbourne.

Magbasa Pa

PAALALA SA LEGAL: Ang mga artikulo at post sa blog na inilathala ng Australian Migration Lawyers ay nagbibigay lamang ng pangkalahatang impormasyon at hindi bumubuo ng payong legal sa migrasyon. Ang pagbabasa ng nilalamang ito ay hindi lumilikha ng ugnayan sa pagitan ng abogado at kliyente, at ang anumang pag-asa dito ay mahigpit na nasa iyong sariling peligro. Dahil madalas na nagbabago ang mga batas sa migrasyon, mangyaring kumonsulta sa isang rehistradong Abogado ng Australia para sa propesyonal na payo na angkop sa iyong mga partikular na kalagayan bago gumawa ng anumang mga desisyon o aplikasyon sa migrasyon.

Graphic ng icon ng chat

Mag-book ng libreng 30 minutong konsultasyon

Sabihin sa amin ang tungkol sa iyong sitwasyon, at babalik kami sa iyo sa lalong madaling panahon.

Disclaimer kopya

Salamat! Natanggap na ang inyong pagsusumite!
Oops! May nangyaring mali habang nagsusumite ng form.
Graphic ng icon ng chat

Mag-book ng libreng 30 minutong konsultasyon

Sabihin sa amin ang tungkol sa iyong sitwasyon, at babalik kami sa iyo sa lalong madaling panahon.

Disclaimer kopya

Salamat! Natanggap na ang inyong pagsusumite!
Oops! May nangyaring mali habang nagsusumite ng form.

Claim ang iyong konsultasyon

Sabihin sa amin ng kaunti tungkol sa iyong sitwasyon, at ang isa sa aming mga abogado sa migration ay makakakuha ng bumalik sa iyo sa lalong madaling panahon.