Need help? We are available to speak to you 7 days a weekRead More

Australia's largest independent migration law firm. Get a FREE Consultation

Need help? We are available 7 days a week.

Cross symbol icon
Blank Image
0800 010 010
Open 7 days
Smartphone icon
1300 150 745

Australia's Next Wave of Migration Reform: What a Postponed Speech Signals for Visa Applicants

Senior Associate - Senior Australian Migration Lawyer
Published on:
August 6, 2026
|
Modified on:
August 6, 2026
No items found.
Senior Associate - Senior Australian Migration Lawyer
Published on:
August 6, 2026
Modified on:
August 6, 2026
Senior Associate - Senior Australian Migration Lawyer
Published on:
August 6, 2026
Modified on:
August 6, 2026
Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

  • The Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Tony Burke, has postponed a major National Press Club address on migration policy.
  • Visa application charges rose by approximately 25 per cent from 1 July 2026, with the Partner visa charge now $11,710.
  • Two ministerial directives currently prioritise onshore applicants over offshore applicants for permanent skilled and family visas.
  • A broader reform package, reportedly considered by Cabinet, has not been finalised or legislated.
  • Reported proposals include changes to family visa pathways, Protection visa work and appeal rights, and Working Holiday visa arrangements.
  • Applicants and sponsors with a matter that could be affected should seek advice on their current position before any further changes are announced.
minute read

A Speech Postponed, Not a Policy Confirmed

The Minister for Home Affairs and Immigration and Citizenship, Tony Burke, has postponed his National Press Club address, where he was due to give a major update on migration policy this week. According to reporting, some elements were not yet finalised, and a new date is being arranged.

This distinction matters for anyone following the story. The postponement does not mean legislation has passed, and it does not mean any specific visa pathway has already changed. It follows the confirmation of two measures already in effect, alongside reports of a broader reform package still under Cabinet consideration.

What Has Already Changed

Two changes are confirmed and currently in force, separate from anything still under discussion.

Visa Application Fee Increase

Visa application charges rose by approximately 25 per cent from 1 July 2026. The Partner visa application charge, covering Subclass 820/801 (Partner visa (Temporary and Permanent)) for onshore applicants and Subclass 309/100 (Partner visa (Provisional and Migrant)) for offshore applicants, now stands at $11,710 for the primary applicant, with additional charges for dependants aged 18 and over and under 18. This increase was not formally announced at the time but is reflected in the Federal Budget papers and confirmed on the Department of Home Affairs current visa pricing page. Applicants budgeting for a family visa application should work from the current fee schedule rather than figures published before 1 July 2026.

Processing Priority for Onshore Applicants

The Minister has issued two ministerial directives instructing the Department of Home Affairs to prioritise onshore applicants over offshore applicants for permanent skilled and family visas, with limited exceptions for applicants in law enforcement and defence roles. In practice, this means an applicant already residing in Australia may have their application processed ahead of a person applying for the same visa subclass from outside the country. Given the existing backlog in several visa categories, offshore applicants may experience longer waiting periods relative to their onshore counterparts, without any change to their underlying eligibility.

What Remains Under Consideration

Reporting also points to a broader package reportedly considered by Cabinet but not yet settled, forming the basis of the postponed Press Club address. None of the following measures have been legislated, and government sources have described the remaining sticking points as unresolved details rather than a change in overall direction. This section should be read as an account of matters currently under discussion, not a statement of current law.

Reported proposals include:

  • Restrictions preventing family members of Australian citizens and permanent residents from applying for a family visa while in Australia on a tourist visa
  • Changes to work rights and appeal rights for Protection visa applicants
  • Expanded ballot systems and caps on Working Holiday visa extensions into a second or third year

Who Could Be Affected If These Proposals Proceed

If any of these proposals are confirmed, the following groups could be affected:

  • Families currently relying on a tourist-to-bridging-visa strategy while a partner or parent visa is finalised
  • Offshore applicants for skilled and family visas, who may already be experiencing longer waits under the current processing priority directive
  • Protection visa applicants, who may face new limits on work rights during assessment and on appeal rights if a claim is rejected
  • Working Holiday visa holders planning a second or third year in Australia

Anyone with an active or upcoming application that could be affected, particularly a family visa application where a tourist visa pathway is being considered, should seek advice on their individual circumstances before relying on the current onshore tourist-to-bridging-visa arrangement.

Why This Matters in the Broader Context

Net overseas migration reached 306,000 in the 2024-25 financial year, down from a peak of 556,000 in the year ending September 2023, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Despite this decline, migration levels have continued to exceed Treasury forecasts, contributing to sustained pressure from opposition parties for further reductions. This context helps explain why the government appears to be pursuing both administrative measures, such as the fee increase and processing directives, and a more substantial legislative package addressing family, protection, and Working Holiday visa settings.

For applicants and sponsors, the practical takeaway is that Australia's migration settings are in a period of active change. A decision made under current settings may need to be revisited if further reforms are announced, and the timing of an application can materially affect how it is treated.

How We Can Help You

Migration law is shifting, and understanding how a proposed change might affect your specific visa pathway requires more than reading the headlines. Our team at Australian Migration Lawyers keeps a close watch on developments like these and can help you understand what any confirmed or proposed change means for your circumstances, whether you are considering a family visa application, currently on a bridging visa, or planning a Working Holiday extension. We offer a free, no-obligation consultation, available seven days a week, to discuss your situation and the options available to you.

Nicholas Merlin Esq.

With 15 years of experience in United States law and public administration, followed by 5 years practising Australian migration law, Nick brings a depth of cross-jurisdictional legal expertise to his work as an Australian migration lawyer.

Nick holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Florida State University (2000), a Juris Doctorate from St. Thomas University School of Law (2004), and a Master of Public Administration from Florida State University (2007). He has been a member of the Florida Bar since 2006 and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar since 2007, establishing a distinguished international legal career before relocating to Melbourne in 2021.

After completing his Australian legal studies at La Trobe University and The College of Law, he was admitted as an Australian lawyer by the Supreme Court of Victoria in 2022. He subsequently obtained Legal Practitioner Number 5513285, through which he practises in migration law. He is a member of the Law Institute of Victoria.

Nick offers expert guidance on a wide range of migration matters. Having personally navigated the migration process himself, he brings both professional expertise and genuine understanding of what clients experience throughout the process.

Nick serves clients nationally, including in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth, and Adelaide, providing comprehensive support.  

He has represented clients in proceedings before the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART), bringing tribunal advocacy experience to complex and contested migration matters.

Outside his professional life, Nick enjoys reading, travel, and exploring Melbourne's coffee culture.

Read More

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Articles and blog posts published by Australian Migration Lawyers provide general information only and do not constitute migration or legal advice. Reading this content does not create a lawyer-client relationship, and any reliance on it is strictly at your own risk. Because migration laws change frequently, please consult a registered Australian Lawyer for professional advice tailored to your specific circumstances before making any migration decisions or applications.

Chat icon graphic

Book your free 30 minute consultation

Tell us about your situation, and we will get back to you shortly.

Disclaimer copy

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Chat icon graphic

Book your free 30 minute consultation

Tell us about your situation, and we will get back to you shortly.

Disclaimer copy

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Claim your consultation

Tell us a little about your situation, and one of our migration lawyers will get back to you as soon as possible.

No items found.