Australia's largest independent migration law firm. Get a FREE Consultation
Need help? We are available 7 days a week.


Winner of Most Trusted Australian Migration Law Firm 2023-2026
Ranked 1st for migration law in 2023, 2024 & 2025

Ranked in the top migration lawyers 2023, 2024, 2025 & 2026

Ranked the best migration law firm 2024 & 2025


Decision-ready applications, prepared by lawyers.
No Visa, No Fee options available.*
Free initial consultation (T&Cs apply).
Key Takeaways
From 25 July 2026, nomination and visa applications for certain skilled visas are processed according to Ministerial Direction 119, which has replaced Ministerial Direction 105 in full. Direction 119 applies to all on-hand applications, including the Skills in Demand (SID) visa, which was not previously covered by Direction 105.
Under Direction 119, prioritisation depends on two factors: the applicant's occupation, and whether the applicant was in Australia at the time of application. Occupations supporting Australia's law enforcement and defence interests receive the highest priority, followed by construction, healthcare and teaching occupations. Within this framework, applicants already in Australia are given higher priority than those applying from overseas.
In practice, this means an offshore applicant in a priority occupation such as healthcare or teaching is still processed after any onshore applicant in that same occupation. Offshore applicants outside the priority occupation categories face the lowest processing priority of all.
[free_consultation]
If you are interested in getting more information about a visa, get in touch with Australian Migration Lawyers for a consultation.
[/free_consultation]
Before Direction 119 took effect, decisions on many skilled visa applications were being made within a matter of weeks. Industry reporting since the change indicates offshore applicants outside the priority categories, including nurses and teachers, are now facing waits of up to around 12 months.
Migration and recruitment professionals have raised concerns about the practical effect of prioritising by occupation category alone. Because the priority tiers are broad and based on occupation category rather than specific skill shortages, migration professionals have noted a possible side effect: an onshore applicant in a broadly-defined priority category could be processed ahead of an offshore applicant in a genuinely hard-to-fill specialist role, simply due to location at the time of application.
The change forms part of a broader government effort to reduce Net Overseas Migration (NOM), which the government has targeted to bring down from around 300,000 to 225,000 by 2028. Family visa processing has been affected by a parallel change, and Working Holiday Maker visa processing has also reportedly slowed as part of the same broader approach.
[aml_difference][/aml_difference]
The changes have drawn criticism from business and mining groups, who argue the settings could affect Australia's ability to fill specialist roles that cannot be sourced locally. Industry bodies have pointed to sectors including construction, healthcare and resources as being particularly reliant on offshore-sourced specialist skills, and have called for a more differentiated approach that better reflects genuine skill shortages within individual occupations.
Employers currently recruiting offshore for skilled or employer-sponsored roles should factor the extended processing timeframes into workforce planning, particularly for roles outside the priority occupation categories. Where a role can realistically be filled onshore, whether through the local labour market or an existing visa holder already in Australia, this pathway may now offer a materially faster route to visa grant under the new prioritisation framework.
For offshore applicants already in the system, an existing application has not been withdrawn or refused as a result of this change, but its position in the processing order may now be lower than previously expected.
[success_stories] [/success_stories]
Whether you're an employer planning your recruitment pipeline or an applicant affected by these processing changes, understanding how Direction 119 applies to your specific occupation and circumstances is essential to planning realistically. Our migration lawyers can review your situation, explain your options under the current framework, and help you consider whether an onshore pathway may better suit your timeframe.
We offer a free consultation, available seven days a week, to help you navigate these changes.

With 15 years of experience in United States law and public administration, followed by 5 years practising Australian migration law, Nick brings a depth of cross-jurisdictional legal expertise to his work as an Australian migration lawyer.
Nick holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Florida State University (2000), a Juris Doctorate from St. Thomas University School of Law (2004), and a Master of Public Administration from Florida State University (2007). He has been a member of the Florida Bar since 2006 and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar since 2007, establishing a distinguished international legal career before relocating to Melbourne in 2021.
After completing his Australian legal studies at La Trobe University and The College of Law, he was admitted as an Australian lawyer by the Supreme Court of Victoria in 2022. He subsequently obtained Legal Practitioner Number 5513285, through which he practises in migration law. He is a member of the Law Institute of Victoria.
Nick offers expert guidance on a wide range of migration matters. Having personally navigated the migration process himself, he brings both professional expertise and genuine understanding of what clients experience throughout the process.
Nick serves clients nationally, including in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth, and Adelaide, providing comprehensive support.
He has represented clients in proceedings before the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART), bringing tribunal advocacy experience to complex and contested migration matters.
Outside his professional life, Nick enjoys reading, travel, and exploring Melbourne's coffee culture.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Articles and blog posts published by Australian Migration Lawyers provide general information only and do not constitute migration or legal advice. Reading this content does not create a lawyer-client relationship, and any reliance on it is strictly at your own risk. Because migration laws change frequently, please consult a registered Australian Lawyer for professional advice tailored to your specific circumstances before making any migration decisions or applications.
Tell us about your situation, and we will get back to you shortly.
Tell us about your situation, and we will get back to you shortly.
Tell us a little about your situation, and one of our migration lawyers will get back to you as soon as possible.