お困りですか?年中無休で対応いたします

Australia's largest independent migration law firm. Get a FREE Consultation T&C's apply

お困りですか?週7日対応いたします。

十字記号アイコン
年中無休
スマートフォンのアイコン
1300 150 745

Migration Court Review Lawyers Perth

Judicial Review of Migration Decisions in Perth Courts

If your visa or migration matter has been refused by the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART), you may still have legal options through a migration court review. Our Perth migration lawyers provide expert advice on whether a tribunal decision contains legal errors and whether it can be challenged in court. We assist with preparing judicial review applications, legal arguments, and court representation to ensure your case is properly presented before the Federal Circuit and Family Court.

「ベスト・ローヤーズ」の
部門で2026年および2027年のランキングに選出


オーストラリア法曹賞の受賞者

2027年 オーストラリアのベスト法律事務所ランキング(

ドイル社の『
』ガイドにおいて、2023年から2026年までの「
」分野における主要な移民法弁護士としてランクイン

チャット・アイコン・グラフィック

コンサルテーションのお申し込み

お客様の状況をお聞かせください。

免責コピー

ありがとうございました!あなたの投稿は受理されました!
おっと!フォームの送信中に何か問題が発生しました。
チャット・アイコン・グラフィック

コンサルテーションのお申し込み

お客様の状況をお聞かせください。

免責コピー

ありがとうございました!あなたの投稿は受理されました!
おっと!フォームの送信中に何か問題が発生しました。

What Is a Migration Court Review?

A migration court review is a legal process where a court examines whether a migration decision was made according to law. Unlike an appeal, the court doesn't reassess the facts of your visa case, and instead focuses on whether legal errors occurred during the decision-making process. This distinction between a court review and a merits review matters: an ART appeal reconsiders your case on its merits, while a court review only considers whether the decision was lawfully made.

Difference between ART appeals and court reviews
ART appeals involve a full merits review, where the tribunal reassesses facts and evidence. Court reviews, however, only consider whether the tribunal or decision-maker made a legal or procedural error.
Role of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
This court reviews migration decisions to determine whether jurisdictional errors or other legal mistakes occurred. It doesn't substitute its own decision but may set aside unlawful decisions.
Legal grounds required for judicial review
You must establish that a legal error occurred, such as a procedural fairness breach, misinterpretation of law, or failure to properly consider relevant evidence.

When Can You Apply for a Migration Court Review?

After an unsuccessful ART appeal

You may apply for a court review if your ART appeal has been unsuccessful and you believe the tribunal made a legal error in its decision.

When there is a legal error in the tribunal decision

Court review is only available where the decision involves a jurisdictional or legal error, not simply because you disagree with the outcome.

When procedural fairness was denied

If you weren't given a fair opportunity to present your case, respond to adverse information, or receive proper notice, you may have grounds for review.

Courts That Handle Migration Judicial Reviews

Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Migration Division)

This court, commonly known by its acronym FCFCOA, handles most migration judicial review applications through its migration list, and is often the first level of court review for visa matters.

Federal Court of Australia

The Federal Court hears more complex or significant migration matters, including certain appeals from the Federal Circuit and Family Court, which may in turn proceed to the Full Federal Court.

High Court of Australia (special leave applications)

In rare cases, migration matters may proceed to the High Court, but only where special leave is granted due to important legal questions.

Migration Court Review Legal Assistance in Perth

Reviewing tribunal decisions for legal errors

We conduct a detailed review of your ART decision, including the written reasons, hearing transcript where available, and supporting case materials. The focus is on identifying whether the tribunal made a jurisdictional error, failed to apply the law correctly, overlooked relevant evidence, or relied on irrelevant considerations.

Preparing court applications and legal arguments

If legal grounds exist, we prepare and lodge the necessary court documents within strict filing deadlines, including drafting the application for judicial review and preparing supporting affidavits and evidence.

Representation during court hearings

We provide full representation throughout Federal Circuit and Family Court or Federal Court proceedings, including directions hearings, interlocutory applications, and final hearings.

Strategic advice for complex immigration litigation

We provide honest and practical advice on the strengths and weaknesses of your case, including alternative migration pathways that may be available if court action isn't viable or successful.

オーストラリア移民法弁護士の違い

Meet With Our Perth Migration Court Review Lawyers

At your initial consultation, you'll meet directly with one of our migration lawyers. They will explain our services, discuss your options, and guide you through the entire process. You'll also receive a fixed, upfront fee for ongoing services.

We offer a range of flexible payment options. In addition to our friendly, compassionate in-person support in Perth, we also provide online appointments for your convenience.

Visit us icon

Visit us (by appointment)

Level 12/26 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000

電話アイコン

電話

Call us on 1300 150 745

Office hours icon

受付時間

Monday – Friday: 9am – 6pm

Saturday – Sunday: 9am – 1pm

Parking icon

駐車場

ウィルソン・パーキングの地下駐車場(徒歩4分)

Payment options icon

支払い方法

Bank transfer, credit card (Mastercard, VISA, or AMEX), 3-6 monthly instalments available in some cases

Visa Services from Trusted Perth Migration Lawyers

50年以上

経験年数

成功率100

真摯かつ継続的な配偶者関係に基づくパートナービザについて

経験豊富

審判所や裁判所において依頼人を代理する移民法専門の弁護士および移民代理業者

受賞歴のある

移民弁護士および移民エージェントの第一人者として知られる法律事務所

パースでの成功事例

各地域の拠点

目的地を探す

オーストラリア全土における専門移民法サービス

当事務所の移民法に関する専門知識は、オーストラリアの首都にお住まいのお客様をサポートするだけではありません。当事務所は、オーストラリア全土の様々な場所で、個人、家族、企業に対して包括的なサポートを提供しています。

または

Migration Court Review Process

1

Reviewing the ART decision for legal errors

We carefully examine the tribunal's decision to identify any jurisdictional or procedural errors that may support a court challenge.

2

Filing a judicial review application in court

If grounds exist, we prepare and lodge the necessary court documents within strict legal time limits.

3

Preparing legal submissions and evidence

We draft detailed legal arguments outlining the errors made in the decision and supporting case law.

4

Court hearings and legal arguments

We represent you in court, presenting arguments and responding to the Department's legal submissions.

5

Court judgment and possible outcomes

The court may set aside the decision, send the matter back for reconsideration, or dismiss the application.

Legal Grounds for Judicial Review

Jurisdictional error by the tribunal

A jurisdictional error occurs when the ART exceeds its legal authority or fails to exercise its power correctly under migration law. This may include applying the wrong legal test, misunderstanding the scope of its decision-making power, or making findings not legally open on the evidence. Where jurisdictional error is established, the court may set aside the decision as legally invalid, sometimes through orders such as certiorari to quash the decision or mandamus to compel the decision-maker to act according to law.

Denial of procedural fairness

Procedural fairness, also known as natural justice, requires that you're given a fair and reasonable opportunity to present your case and respond to adverse information before a decision is made. A procedural fairness breach may occur if you weren't properly notified of issues affecting your case, weren't given access to adverse material, or weren't given a meaningful opportunity to respond. In some cases, this can overlap with an apprehended bias claim, where the circumstances suggest the decision-maker may not have approached the matter with an open mind.

Failure to consider relevant evidence

A tribunal decision may be legally flawed if it fails to properly consider evidence that is relevant and material to the outcome of your case.

Incorrect interpretation of the migration law

This ground arises where the tribunal misapplies, misunderstands, or incorrectly interprets provisions of the Migration Act or associated regulations. In rare cases, this can amount to an error of law on the face of the record, a narrower and more technical ground than jurisdictional error, which may be raised in addition to it depending on the circumstances.
移民裁判所の審査

Important Deadlines for Migration Court Reviews

Strict time limits apply to migration court review applications. Under Section 477 of the Migration Act 1958, you generally have 35 days from the date of the decision to file for judicial review of a migration decision. The court may extend this deadline at its discretion if it's satisfied that doing so is in the interests of justice, but there's no guarantee an extension of time will be granted, so it's important to seek advice as early as possible.

Documents Required for a Migration Court Review

ART decision and tribunal records

The written decision and all related tribunal documents are essential for identifying legal errors.

Migration application history

This includes your visa applications, refusals, and appeal records.

Supporting legal documentation

Any evidence relevant to procedural fairness or legal errors should be provided.

Written legal arguments and affidavits

These documents form the basis of your court case and outline the grounds for review.

Possible Outcomes of a Migration Court Review

Court sets aside the tribunal decision

If the court finds that a jurisdictional or legal error has occurred, it may set aside, or quash, the Tribunal's decision. In some cases, this can reopen your migration matter, though the court itself doesn't usually grant a visa; it focuses on correcting legal errors in the decision-making process.

Court sends the case back for reconsideration

Where a decision is set aside, the court will often remit the matter to the Administrative Review Tribunal or the original decision-maker for reconsideration, this time in accordance with the law as clarified by the court.

Court dismisses the application

If the court determines that no jurisdictional or legal error has been proven, the application will be dismissed and the original tribunal decision remains in effect.

Risks and Considerations in Migration Court Litigation

Legal costs and court fees

Court proceedings can involve significant legal and filing costs depending on complexity.

Risk of losing the case

If unsuccessful, you may be required to comply with the original visa refusal outcome.

Importance of strong legal grounds

Court reviews are only successful where clear legal errors can be demonstrated.

オーストラリア移民法弁護士チーム

Costs Involved in a Migration Court Review

Federal court filing fees

As at 1 July 2026, the individual filing fee for a migration matter in the Federal Circuit and Family Court is $4,180 (full fee) or $2,090 (reduced fee where eligible), one of the main costs involved in a migration judicial review, alongside a setting-down fee and daily hearing fee of $1,035 each for an individual applicant.

Legal representation and litigation costs

Costs vary depending on case complexity and level of court involvement.

Additional legal preparation expenses

These may include document preparation, affidavits, and expert legal submissions.

Why Choose Our Perth Migration Court Review Lawyers

We provide experienced legal representation in migration litigation matters, including judicial review applications in the Federal Circuit and Family Court. Our approach focuses on identifying legal errors, building strong arguments, and guiding clients through complex court processes.

移民裁判所の審査
移民裁判所の審査

Migration Court Review Hearings in Perth

Migration matters for Western Australia are heard at the Commonwealth Law Courts, Peter Durack Building, 1 Victoria Avenue, Perth. This is the Federal Circuit and Family Court's own registry, not an AML office. Court documents are filed with, and hearings conducted by, the Court directly, though our lawyers appear on your behalf in proceedings connected to this registry.

パースで数々の賞を受賞した移民法専門弁護士

当社のパース事務所は、全国的に認められた移民法に関する専門知識を、パースおよび西オーストラリア州のお客様へ直接提供しています。以下に挙げるすべての受賞歴は、同業者による評価、お客様からのフィードバック、職場監査など、独立した審査を通じて獲得したものです。パースの当事務所の移民弁護士にご依頼いただくことは、その品質が外部から検証された法律事務所と提携することになります。

2027
|
ベスト・ローヤーズ
オーストラリアのトップ法律事務所

「Australian Migration Lawyers」は、Best Lawyersによる『2027年版 ベスト・ロー・ファームズ(オーストラリア版)』に選出されました。同ランキングは、クライアントからのフィードバック、同業者による推薦、および市場における総合的な評価に基づいて決定されます。この選出は、当事務所が移民法分野において、全国レベルで最高水準の法的サービスを提供していることを裏付けるものです。

続きを読む
2027
|
ベスト・ローヤーズ
オーストラリアのベスト・ローヤーズ™ 移民法

ペリー・Q・ウッド氏は、『2027年版 Best Lawyers in Australia™』の移民法部門において選出されました。このランキングは、同分野のベテラン弁護士による秘密厳守のピアレビューを通じてのみ決定されます。同誌は、世界的に権威ある法律専門ガイドブックとして知られています。

続きを読む
2026
|
ドイルのガイド
移民法の第一人者

ペリー・Q・ウッド氏は、『ドイルズ・ガイド2026』において、ビクトリア州の「トップ移民法弁護士」に選出されました。『ドイルズ・ガイド』への4年連続の掲載は、オーストラリアの移民法分野における卓越した実績と同業者からの高い評価が、長年にわたり確かなものとして認められていることを示しています。

続きを読む

Costs involved when applying for an Australian visa in Perth

The government costs vary for each visa type, and you also need to factor in the cost of living while you await the outcome of your visa application. Consulting a reliable Perth immigration lawyer can clarify details relating to specific visas and guide you on professional fees, Department of Home Affairs fees and other associated costs.

予約相談

パースの専門家チームをご紹介します

パースの当事務所の移民法専門弁護士は、週7日対応可能です。当事務所にご依頼いただければ、初回相談から案件の解決に至るまで、担当弁護士と直接やり取りすることができます。
ヘイリー・キム オーストラリア人リーガル・エグゼクティブ

パースにおける移住の歴史

パースの移民の歴史は19世紀初頭にさかのぼります。1829年にスワン川植民地が自由入植地として設立され、西オーストラリア州の海岸沿いに英国からの入植者が集まりました。1890年代の金発見により、パースは一夜にして様変わりし、オーストラリア全土や英国、さらにはそれ以外の地域からも移民が押し寄せ、この都市は西部の商業の中心地としての地位を確固たるものにしました。続きを読む

第二次世界大戦後の時代には、イタリア、ギリシャ、および南・東ヨーロッパのその他の地域から大規模な移民の波が押し寄せ、フリーマントルは多くの移民船にとって最初の入国地点となりました。 現在、西オーストラリア州はオーストラリアのどの州よりも海外生まれの住民の割合が高く、パースの住民の約3人に1人が海外生まれです。この多様性は、技能移民、人道的な理由で入国した人々、そしてアジア、インド亜大陸、太平洋諸国からの留学生によって形作られ、今もなお拡大し続けています。続きを隠す

パースの移民の歴史は19世紀初頭にさかのぼります。1829年にスワン川植民地が自由入植地として設立されると、西オーストラリア州の海岸沿いに英国からの入植者が集まりました。1890年代の金発見により、パースはほぼ一夜にして様変わりし、オーストラリア全土や英国、さらにはそれ以外の地域からも移民が押し寄せ、この都市は西部の商業の中心地としての地位を確固たるものにしました。

第二次世界大戦後の時代には、イタリア、ギリシャ、および南・東ヨーロッパのその他の地域から大規模な移民の波が押し寄せ、フリーマントルは多くの移民船にとって最初の入国地点となりました。 現在、西オーストラリア州はオーストラリアのどの州よりも海外生まれの住民の割合が高く、パースの住民の約3人に1人が海外生まれです。この多様性は、熟練労働者の移民、人道的な理由で入国した人々、そしてアジア、インド亜大陸、太平洋諸国からの留学生によって形作られ、今もなお拡大し続けています。

オーストラリア全土でLGBTIQ+ビザを扱った経験があります。

FAQs About Migration Court Reviews Perth

It's a legal process where a court reviews whether a migration decision involved legal or procedural errors.

You generally have 35 days from the date of the ART decision to file for judicial review under Section 477 of the Migration Act, though the court has discretion to extend this in limited circumstances.

Generally, courts focus on legal errors rather than new factual evidence.

Timelines vary but cases can take several months depending on complexity and court schedules.

Legal representation is strongly recommended due to the technical nature of migration law and court procedures.

Migration matters for Western Australia are heard at the Commonwealth Law Courts on Victoria Avenue, Perth, through the Federal Circuit and Family Court's Perth registry.

This page provides general legal information, not legal advice, and doesn't take into account your individual circumstances. If your situation is time-sensitive, we'd encourage you to book a consultation with our team as soon as possible to get advice specific to you.

コンテンツ作成者について

ペリー・Q・ウッド

ペリー・Q・ウッドはオーストラリア行政法学会の前会長であり、オーストラリアを代表する行政・移民・人権弁護士。

無料相談をお申し込みください

お客様の状況をお聞かせいただければ、すぐに移民弁護士からご連絡させていただきます。